特巴斯:皇马主席对内格雷拉案完全一知半解,装什么正义化身(特巴斯批皇马主席:对内格雷拉案知之甚少,却自诩正义使者)
发布时间:2026-01-02

Considering user request

The user provided a Chinese news headline about Javier Tebas's comments on Real Madrid's president regarding the Negreira case. Since there’s no specific question, I think they might want a summary, background, or translation. I could explain that Tebas is accusing Florentino Pérez of being uninformed about the scandal involving referee payments. It’s best to give context about the Negreira case, but I need to note my knowledge cutoff is October 2024, and events might have changed since then.Providing translation and context

I’m translating the quote: “Tebas: Real Madrid's president is completely clueless about the Negreira case—why act like a paragon of justice?” Now, adding some background, the Negreira case involves FC Barcelona's payments to former referee vice president José María Enríquez Negreira from 2001 to 2018, with allegations of corruption. By October 2023, Barcelona was indicted for suspected bribery. In 2024, developments included a Spanish court reclassifying the case to "systemic corruption" and further investigations being ordered. Real Madrid also became a private accuser.Providing context and options

享有无罪推

I can explore the tension between Tebas and Florentino Pérez, particularly regarding the Super League conflict. I should keep a balanced view and avoid claiming knowledge of the specific quote's date; instead, I'll present likely context and ask the user for clarification.

I can offer options like:

  1. A quick background
  2. A timeline of events
  3. A translation of the quote
  4. Information on what’s next legally

I’ll ask how the user wants to proceed, ensuring I maintain a conversational tone while being cautious about my knowledge cutoff date.Crafting a structured response

I’ll start by translating the headline. Then, I can explain who Tebas and Florentino Pérez are, along with the details of the Negreira case. I'll consider why Tebas made his comment—thinking about Real Madrid's position, their media coverage, and the broader LaLiga politics, including the Super League situation.

Next, I can summarize the current legal status of the investigation, noting details like the payments involved and the lack of match-fixing evidence. I'll highlight key timeline events and then ask the user what they want: more details, sources, or a full summary of Tebas’s comments. Keeping it crisp is essential!

这是在说:西甲主席哈维尔·特巴斯抨击皇马主席弗洛伦蒂诺·佩雷斯,对“内格雷拉案”并不了解,却摆出“伸张正义”的姿态。

快背景

  • 人物:特巴斯=西甲联盟主席;弗洛伦蒂诺=皇马主席。两人长期不睦(转播、VAR/裁判话题、欧洲超级联赛等)。
  • 内格雷拉案:指巴萨在2001–2018年间向时任西班牙裁判技术委员会前副主席恩里克斯·内格雷拉及其公司支付款项(累计约数百万欧元),涉嫌“商业腐败/贿赂”等。案件由巴塞罗那第1号调查法庭主导,2023–2024年持续侦办。
  • 皇马立场:皇马以“私人指控方”身份介入诉讼;俱乐部及皇马TV长期批评裁判判罚与巴萨关联。特巴斯多次指责皇马“施压裁判、操弄舆论”。

为何会有这句

收益分配

  • 语气是在反击皇马在该案上的“道德制高点”叙事;特巴斯的意思是:案件复杂,司法仍在推进,皇马方面不了解细节却频繁“评判”。
  • 也是西甲内部政治博弈的延伸:特巴斯与皇马、巴萨在媒体权、收益分配、超级联赛上对立已久。

案件进展要点(截至我所知的2024年10月)

  • 法院已把巴萨、若干前高管及内格雷拉父子纳入调查;指控包括可能的贿赂/商业腐败等。
  • 目前无法院判决认定“操纵比赛成立”;裁判群体与足协方面也多次表示未见比赛层面的直接证据。
  • 程序仍在推进,结论未出,相关各方均享有无罪推定。

你想要哪种信息?

ns

  1. 给你这次特巴斯完整发言与场合的梳理
  2. 内格雷拉案简明时间线
  3. 双方(西甲、皇马、巴萨)在此议题上的主要论点对比
  4. 英文/中文双语速译与媒体标题改写建议

告诉我你选哪一个,或直接说你更关心的点。